Israel's Illegal Organ Trafficking & Nazi Parallels

Global Connections, Western Complicity, and “Deemed Consent” Organ Donors in Canada

Recently I wrote about the theory that the Nazis did not quite go away after WWII. They just adapted the ideology and called themselves Zionists, hid themselves in Israel and other Western countries across the globe, and avoided criticism for decades by collaborating with corrupt international elites and hiding behind claims of “antisemitism.”

Please read additional support of this argument here and here and here. To add further evidence, I must delve into the subject of organ trafficking. Because Israel has another commonality with Nazi Germany: they have their own Dr. Mengele equivalents who participate in unethical organ harvesting practices. The West appears complicit by at least enabling their crimes if not actively participating in them.

Nuremberg doctors’ trials 1947

ECHOES OF NAZI GERMANY IN ISRAELI MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

Dr. Josef Mengele, aka the Angel of Death, was one of the Nazi doctors who tortured and murdered Jews during the Holocaust. These so-called doctors used organs gathered from Jews as well as other victims for medical research. Neuropathologist Julius Hallervorden at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Brain Research in Berlin-Buch for instance admitted to collecting hundreds of brains from victims of the Nazi euthanasia program, while Berthold Ostertag, who worked at the Wiesengrund euthanasia facility in Berlin-Wittenau, conducted neuropathological research on the brains of euthanized children killed at the facility. His publications indicate institutional support for his research, and you can see other elements of institutionalization through people like Carl Schneider, who was the chair of psychiatry in Heidelberg. He was involved in selecting children with mental disabilities to euthanize and study their brains. A considerable proportion of organs harvested by the Nazis in fact stemmed from victims of euthanasia, and in 1942, Heinrich Himmler authorized medical experiments on Auschwitz prisoners, which lead to inhumane studies involving organ removal and transplantation.

There is evidence that unethical and illegal organ harvesting practices have been alive and well within Israel almost since inception. Israel has been frequently accused of this. Nancy Scheper-Hughes, Medical Anthropology Professor at UC Berkeley and founder of Organ Watch, called Israel the “top” traffickers of illegally harvested organs. A report by Al Jazeera indicated that this is partially due to religious reasons; the report stated that the demand of organs is high “for cultural reasons… religious Jews don’t like to donate organs.” According to Mondoweiss, conservative religious sects such as the cultish Chabad-Lubavitch have manipulated Jewish law to further Jewish supremacist ideology. Per the article, in 1996 Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, leader of the sect, stated: “If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has infinite value. There is something infinitely more holy and unique about Jewish life than non-Jewish life.”

As such there is a long transplant waitlist in Israel, as there are in many other countries. But while citizens in other countries donate, Israel takes more than they give. Israelis are major recipients of illegal organs, because Israel’s organ-transplant laws are “murky” in regard to the legality of “brokering overseas transplants using paid donors.” In the Yilman Altun case for example in Kosovo (see below), recipients of illegal organs were mainly from Israel, who paid between 80,000 and 100,000 euro to receive them. This is not only unjust to ordinary people across the world who must navigate long waitlists to receive life-saving organs, but also to vulnerable donors, who only agree to sell their body parts because they are desperately poor. The wealthy Israeli mentioned in the Al Jazeera report for example has received three organs while many never receive one. At least one was illegally obtained, and the donor was reportedly “very poor” with a “tragic” story. The Israeli was not prosecuted for the transplant.

As early as 1968 there is evidence of Israel engaging in questionable organ harvesting and transplanting practices. This was when Israel had its first heart transplant, and a man named Avraham Sadegat died of a reported stroke. His body was returned to his family wrapped in bandages, and his heart was missing. The hospital eventually admitted it had used his heart for the transplant without his or his family’s permission, and it is unclear what Sadegat’s medical condition was prior to the removal of his heart.

In 1998, a Scotsman named Alisdair Sinclair also died under strange circumstances while in Israeli custody at Ben Gurion airport. He had smuggled in drugs and then his body was found after he had reportedly committed suicide. According to the Jewish News of Northern California, British records indicate that Israeli police “informally made a request for an organ donation,” however the police deny this. Sinclair’s family reported that the Israelis offered to bury Sinclair in Israel, but the family opted to fly his body home. When it arrived, the body also did not have a heart, and he was also missing a bone from his tongue.

Then of course there is Palestine. In 2009, Donald Bolström published an article in the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet that claimed Israel had been harvesting organs from Palestinians illegally. Israel denied this and called Sweden and everyone else antisemitic, however there is plenty of evidence that this is true. In July 2000, Dr. Jehuda Hiss, an Israeli doctor accused of participating in surgeries that used illegally extracted organs, even admitted to it himself, and when Scheper-Hughes requested further interviews with him, the Israeli Ministry of Health denied Hiss permission to speak with her. You can read further about Israel’s theft and trafficking of Palestinian organs here. If this isn’t Nazi behaviour, I don’t know what is, and Zionists will continue to call you antisemitic for discussing this.

GLOBAL CONNECTIONS & WESTERN COMPLICITY

Israel would not be able to consistently engage in illegal international organ trafficking without some degree of complicity of people in other countries, which adds further support to the “Nazis within global institutions are covering for other Nazis in global institutions” argument. An Israeli international organ trafficking network was for example discovered in South Africa in 2003, which conducted 100 illegal transplants for Israelis. It was at a major South African hospital chain and its chief executive was involved. In 2010, 12 Israelis were arrested in Ukraine on suspicion of selling organs. The recipients were mostly from Israel, and according to a 2015 report from the International Organization for Migration, Ukraine is one of Europe’s most notorious sources of organ removal and trafficking. In 2009, Levy Izhak Rosenbaum, an Israeli citizen, was caught brokering three illegal kidney transplants in New Jersey. He was released in 2014, and “his crimes were not considered deportable.”

Western governments deny that they support or are involved with these illegal activities, however their lack of action in stopping it while wealthy elites in their countries are major recipients of the practice is concerning. Recipients of illegal organs tend to be from countries like the United States, Canada, Israel, and Germany, and there is already evidence that Western institutions may not only have known about activities leading to the practice but also been responsible for the circumstances in which the organs were harvested. Post-NATO bombings of Yugoslavia in 1999, of which the West was complicit, PACE Human Rights Committee received a report in January 2011 by special investigator Dirk Marty. Marty claimed that the KLA, or Kosovo Liberation Army, was engaging in illegal organ harvesting, and that the “international authorities in charge of the region did not consider it necessary to conduct a detailed examination of these circumstances.” You can read more about this here.

A December 2010 Council of Europe report also alleged that organs taken by the KLA were linked to Kosovo’s Medicus clinic, one of the most famous organ trafficking cases linked to Israel in recent history. In 2008, Yilman Altun, a young Turk, collapsed in an airport after promising his kidney to Bezalel Shafran, an Israeli who paid 76,400 pounds for an operation at Medicus. Moshe Harel, an Israeli national, was found to be the “fixer” who located living organ donors for the clinic. The majority of donor recipients were Israeli, and the surgeon, a Turk named Yusuf Sonmez, was arrested and then released on bail. He is still at large.

As well, the founder and funder of Medicus clinic was a German urologist named Dr Manfred Beer, a fact that was downplayed by Western media at the time. When the scandal broke, Beer denied awareness that his clinic was performing illegal transplants, thus the possibility that he could have been involved is rarely discussed or considered. Coverage of the event by the New York Times did not even mention him by name let alone consider potential complicity. They advised he was a “well-meaning European philanthropist who helped local doctors during the war in Kosovo in 1999” without further explanation. But according to the below, he was indeed investigated, and only got off because a German organ recipient, who must have been a wealthy elite to afford an illegal organ, refused to testify. His emails with Lutfi Dervishi suggest Beer may not have been innocent:

It should be noted that Germans are frequently mentioned as one of the major recipients of illegal organs, as are people in Canada, meaning wealthy German and Canadian elites benefit from this illegal practice. Despite cases of illegal organ trafficking being consistently linked to Israel, Western governments also never issue sanctions on them or condemn them for their crimes.

THE RISE OF ORGAN DONATIONS IN CANADA THROUGH EUTHANASIA

I have mentioned before that I’m suspicious of Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying program. These series of articles are introductions to why. Without reading these articles, comparing MAID and organ donations post-euthanasia to Nazi Germany are pure paranoia. But if you see what the argument is, you too may notice the parallels, as Nazi Germany unethically utilized organs from euthanasia patients and passed laws to create a society where increased organ harvesting was normalized and facilitated. As a Canadian, perhaps you can imagine why I’m concerned.

There is of course a benevolent interpretation to Canada’s increase in organ donations in recent years. Canada, like many other countries, truly does have a long waitlist for organ donations, and organ donations truly do save lives. Because of MAID, Canada is now the “global epicentre of harvesting organs from patients who have undergone doctor-assisted suicide.” However, the rise of deaths by MAID is alarming, and it’s also hard to prove where all of these organs are going.

Canada is bound by international guidelines like the 2008 Declaration of Istanbul that forbids illegal organ trafficking, but because of medical privacy laws, it is difficult for the average person to confirm definitively where all of the organs donated through MAID actually go. You have to just trust Canadian institutions that they’re going where they say they’re going. The fact that wealthy elite Canadians are major recipients of organ trafficking makes me want more concrete evidence that these organs are indeed equitably going to people in need.

There is no publicly available data that tracks each MAID donor organ to its final recipient. We cannot verify ourselves who the recipients are. The most recent available data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) indicates that a total of 3,428 organ transplants were performed in Canada in 2023. Only 137 of these were donated from MAID patients, which equates to 4% of total transplants. There is no data available of the total number of organs donated via MAID, thus no data on how many organs were not transplanted and where they are now. So while MAID deaths and organ donations are increasing, there isn’t much publicly available data on the end destination of every organ. There is also no public data from 2024 or 2025.

Perhaps I would not be so concerned if I did not notice that the same slippery slope problem that I discussed regarding MAID also may apply to laws regarding Canadian organ donations. I previously expressed concern about MAID’s slippery slope, whereby the Canadian federal government increasingly lifted restrictions while state and oligarch-funded media promoted lifting further ones. I believe something similar is happening with laws regarding organ donations.

In January 2021, the Canadian province of Nova Scotia became the first province to legalize “deemed consent” for organ donation. “Deemed consent” means residents are automatically registered as organ donors unless they explicitly OPT OUT before they die. On the surface, this does not seem like a problem. However, this means that once one is dead, the deceased and their families no longer have the same legal right to the organs in the body. Consider how this might affect an unexpected death like a murder, suicide, or heart attack, if the deceased had not yet gotten around to opting out. The brother of Alisdair Sinclair for example suspected he may have been murdered, but if this case had happened in Nova Scotia, the family would face challenges in contesting the removal of their loved one’s organs. The family has a right to contest, but only in limited cases, and the law does not give families an absolute veto unless the family can provide concrete evidence that the deceased expressed opposition. Basically, the state has more of a right to the organs than the family does. The Canadian province of New Brunswick followed with adopting this model, Prince Edward Island is in the process of the same,, and the MSM is promoting the model in Ontario.

There are issues to consider with this, such as the concept of “brain death,” and that Canadians are starting to get asked for their organs a bit excessively. It’s a question on MAID forms, they established a day dedicated to raising awareness about donating organs, palliative patients at Burnaby’s Fraser Health who apply for hospice get asked if they would like to donate their eyes after they pass, and this year was the first year this was included on Canadians’ tax forms:

People across the world are desperately in need of life-saving organs. But those who donate organs must do so consensually. Deemed consent and propaganda that veers into promotion of policies greys how consent is provided.

Given elite Israelis and Westerners, which includes Canadians, benefit so much from illegal organ trafficking, and given Canadians have been donating an increased number of organ donations in the past years due to MAID, I have a suggestion for Canadians, particularly given the Nazi parallels. Canadians should resist “deemed consent” measures particularly until we are provided with additional transparency and concrete evidence that MAID organs are going where the government says they are going. This can be provided by the CIHI, Canadian Blood Services, or provincial transplant programs. Any readers in the United Kingdom should also note that you appear to be heading in the same direction. Your MSM and lobbying groups are promoting the same ideas too.